UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 8-K
 

 
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 18, 2018
 

 
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 


Delaware
001-36829
04-3475813
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
430 East 29th Street, Suite 1040
New York, New York 10016
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(646) 440-9100
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instructions A.2. below):

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
 
Emerging growth company 
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 
 


Item 7.01
Regulation FD Disclosure.

Furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein is a copy of a presentation being made by Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on May 18, 2018 at the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois.

In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits
 
(d)
Exhibits

Exhibit
No.
 
Description
   
 
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Presentation, dated May 18, 2018
 

SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
     
Date: May 18, 2018
By:
/s/ Gaurav Shah
 
Name:
Gaurav Shah
 
Title:
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 


Exhibit 99.1
 
 American Society of Gene & Cell TherapyMay 18, 2018    Gaurav Shah, M.D.Chief Executive Officer and President 
 

 Important Information  Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Various statements in this release concerning Rocket’s future expectations, plans and prospects, including without limitation, Rocket’s expectations regarding the safety, effectiveness and timing of product candidates that Rocket may develop, including in collaboration with academic partners, to treat Fanconi Anemia (FA), Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I), Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) and Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO), and the safety, effectiveness and timing of related pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, may constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws and are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should not place reliance on these forward-looking statements, which often include words such as "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "will give", "estimate", "seek", "will", "may", "suggest" or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of those terms. Although Rocket believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, Rocket cannot guarantee such outcomes. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, without limitation, Rocket’s ability to successfully demonstrate the efficacy and safety of such products and pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, its gene therapy programs, the preclinical and clinical results for its product candidates, which may not support further development and marketing approval, Rocket’s ability to commence a registrational study in FA within the projected time periods, the potential advantages of Rocket’s product candidates, actions of regulatory agencies, which may affect the initiation, timing and progress of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials of its product candidates, Rocket’s and its licensors ability to obtain, maintain and protect its and their respective intellectual property, the timing, cost or other aspects of a potential commercial launch of Rocket’s product candidates, Rocket’s ability to manage operating expenses, Rocket’s ability to obtain additional funding to support its business activities and establish and maintain strategic business alliances and new business initiatives, Rocket’s dependence on third parties for development, manufacture, marketing, sales and distribution of product candidates, the outcome of litigation, and unexpected expenditures, as well as those risks more fully discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Rocket’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All such statements speak only as of the date made, and Rocket undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 
 

      Developing best-in-class gene and cell therapies for patients with devastating diseases. Inspired by transformative innovation, built on a sustainable and integrated multi-platform approach.  
 

 About Rocket Pharma  Multi-Platform Gene Therapy (GTx) Company Targeting Rare Diseases1st-in-class with direct on-target mechanism of action (MOA) and clear clinical endpoints    Ex-vivo Lentiviral vectors  Fanconi Anemia (FA) Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I) Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO)  In-vivo AAV  Monogenic Multi-organ Disease  Multiple Near- & Medium-term Company Value Drivers    Near-term Milestones (2018)  Additional clinical data for FA expected over the next 12-18 monthsDisclosure of AAV program (2H18)Additional programs expected to advance towards the clinic (next 12-18 months)  Medium-term Milestones (2019-2021)  FA advances to potential registration trial stage (expected in 2019)Registration trials for currently planned programs; first BLA submissionsPlatform establishment and pipeline expansionCurrently planned programs eligible for Pediatric Priority Review Vouchers  Strong Precedents and World-Class Expertise    Strong Precedents and Sound Strategy  Precedents for lenti- & AAV-based therapiesClearly-defined product metrics across indicationsExperienced company leadersLeading research & manufacturing partners 
 

 Therapies  Discovery  Preclinical  Clinical  Commercial  Fanconi Anemia (FA)          Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I)          Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)          Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO)          Undisclosed AAV          CRISPR/Cas9 for FA          Pipeline-at-a-Glance 
 

                                           In VivoAAV Gene Therapy  Ex VivoLentiviral Gene Therapy  Remove cells &isolate patient HSCs  Laboratory- produced LV        Laboratory- produced AAV  Direct intravenous injection    Gene-modifyHSCs  Infusion of modified HSCs  TherapeuticLVV              TherapeuticAAV  Leveraging the Full Spectrum of GTx Platforms 
 

 Fanconi Anemia (FA)  Background:Etiology: FANC-A gene mutation → impaired DNA repairPathology: Bone marrow failure by age 10. Increased cancer risk of 30-50 fold (Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Head and Neck most common) 1Current available treatment: HSCT, associated w/ GVHDPrevalence: ~2,000 in US/EU~75-80 transplants/yr in US/EU 2 ~30-40% of pts receive transplant 3RP-L102 potential market est. : >250 patients/year Upcoming Milestones:Additional clinical data over the next 12-18 monthsAdvance to global registration trial stage in 2019  FA  LAD-I  PKD  IMO  AAV  1 Alter Br J Hametol 2010; 2 CIBMTR and EBMT registries 2009-2013; 3 Alter BP et al. Haematologica 2017 
 

 Rationale for Gene Therapy in FA: Somatic Mosaicism = “Natural” GTx  Somatic mosaicism in FA leads to stabilization/correction of blood counts, in some cases for decades. This uncommon variant results from a reverse mutation and demonstrates that a modest number of gene-corrected hematopoietic stem cells can repopulate a patient’s blood and bone marrow with corrected (non-FA) cells. 1,2    86 106 126 146 166 186 206 226 246 266  Relative Value (%)     120100806040201    Neutros        VCM  Hb  Plat  1 Soulier, J., et al. (2005) Detection of somatic mosaicism and classification of Fanconi anemia patients by analysis of the FA/BRCA pathway. Blood 105: 1329-1336; 2Data on file: Showing a single patient with a spontaneous correction of blood counts, no therapy administered  Months  Percent Normal 
 

 Gene Therapy Value Proposition: Early, Low-toxicity Intervention to Prevent Hematologic Failure  Gene therapy in FA: Potential to correct blood & bone marrow defect without conditioningNo/limited hospitalization or transplant-unit medical care required No anticipated further increase in risk of head and neck cancerGTx implemented as preventative measure to avert bone marrow failure; BMT is indicated for patients in whom marrow failure has occurred.   
 
 

 Updated Data from Phase 1/2 Gene Therapy Trial of RP-L102 in Patients with Fanconi Anemia   Key efficacy measurements:Genetic correction of bone marrow cells (engraftment): measured by peripheral blood VCNFunctional and phenotypic correction of bone marrow cells: measured by resistance to mitomycin-C (MMC)Functional and phenotypic correction of blood cells: measured by chromosomal stability of T-lymphocytes in the presence of diepoxybutane (DEB)Hematologic correction: measured by changes in previously declining pre-treatment blood count trajectories  Presidential Symposium: Engraftment and Phenotypic Correction of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Non-Conditioned Fanconi Anemia Patients Treated with Ex Vivo Gene TherapyDr. Juan Bueren 
 

 Results from Phase 1/2 Gene Therapy Trial of RP-L102 in Patients with Fanconi Anemia    Results:Genetic correction of bone marrow cells (engraftment): Post-treatment peripheral blood VCN increases in all patients. Patient 02002 (first patient with higher RP-L102 dose)17% at 12 months34% at 19 months44% at 24 monthsTransduction-enhanced RP-L102 confers marked improvements—Pt 01003 demonstrates highest transduction efficiency and earliest engraftment to date: Manufacturing Improvements: Preliminary drug product VCN of ~2.5-3, more than five-fold higher than the best previously achieved (0.53 for patient 02006 and 0.43 for patient 02002)Genetic Correction of BM cells: Early engraftment was accelerated more than three-fold compared to best previous patients  Durable improvements consistent with somatic mosaicism:Phenotypic correction of blood cells (DEB Assay): improvement in chromosomal stability of T-lymphocytes sustained over several months  Phenotypic correction of bone marrow cells (MMC Assay): earlier evidence of gene correction in patients with highest doses (02002 and 02006). In patient 02002,  bone marrow resistance to MMC approaches that of healthy donor: 20% at 12 months70% at 24 months 
 

   Bone Marrow Engraftment: Increasing Levels Confirm Survival Advantage of Gene-Corrected FA Cells    Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018  First Demonstration of Engraftment Without Conditioning (in contrast to Beta-thal, SCD, etc)  02002 (Cryo) (1.7x104 cCFU/Kg)  02004 (Cryo)(6.9x103 cCFU/Kg)  02006 (Fresh)(1.6x105 cCFU/Kg)  02005 (Fresh)(2.8x103 cCFU/Kg)   0.5 1 1.5 2 4 6 9 12 15   0.5 1 1.5 2 3 4 5 6 7.5 9 10 12 18 24 
 

 Functional Correction of Bone Marrow  MMC assay identifies cells resistant to Mitomycin-C (MMC), a standard DNA damaging agent  Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018  Progressive Phenotypic Correction of BM Cells (MMC-Resistance)  
 

 Gene Correction of Bone Marrow Stem Cells: Observed Across Multiple Cell Lineages        Peripheral Blood  Bone Marrow  Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018 
 

 Safety: Lentiviral Integration Profile Demonstrates Preferential Integration Away from Potentially Oncogenic Transcription Start Sites        Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018                    0  2  4  6  8  10  10-5 kb  5-0 kb  0-10  10-20  20-30  30-40  40-50  50-60  60-70  70-80  80-90  90-100      TSS      % in Gene  Upstream  % Integration Sites                    30  40  50  60  70  80  90  In Gene  In Gene ± 10 kb  % Integration Sites  68.7%  76.5%      Random (Control)  LV-Integrations 
 

                         Gene Therapy Confers a Phenotype Similar to Somatic Mosaicism  DEB chromosomal assay measures Diepoxybutane (DEB)- induced chromosome breakage which is elevated in FA  Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018  Healthy Donor  Mosaic FA  Non-reverted FA  Healthy Donor  Mosaic FA  Non-reverted FA  Healthy Donor  Mosaic FA  Non-reverted FA  Healthy Donor  Mosaic FA  Non-reverted FA  Improvement of Chromosomal Stability in Presence of DEB 
 

 Increases of Corrected vs- Non-Corrected Leukocytes Support Potential of Gene Therapy to Restore Normal Bone Marrow Function      Uncorrected leukocytes/µL  Corrected leukocytes/µL                  Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018 
 

                 Gene Therapy Stabilizes Markedly Declining Blood Counts          Months after gene therapy  Months after gene therapy  Months after gene therapy  02002 (Cryo) (1.7x104 cCFU/Kg)(2.5x105 cCD34+/Kg)  02004 (Cryo)(6.9x103 cCFU/Kg)(1.7x105 cCD34+/Kg)  02006 (Fresh)(1.6x105 cCFU/Kg)(4.0x105 cCD34+/Kg)  02005 (Fresh)(2.8x103 cCFU/Kg)(2.3x105 cCD34+/Kg)  Ciemat Data Presented at ASGCT May 2018 
 

 FA: Clinical Summary & Path Forward 
 

 Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I)  Background:ITGB2 gene mutation → impaired CD18 expression & WBC migration → severe infections~50% patients w/severe variant → ~2/3 mortality by age 2Current available treatment: HSCT, associated with GVHDGTx potential market est. >25-50 patients/year Upcoming Milestones:Target IMPD filing in Spain in 4Q18  FA  LAD-I  PKD  IMO  AAV 
 

 Rationale for Gene Therapy in LAD-I: CD18 Expression Correlative to Patient Survival  The grey diamond indicates the 39% survival to age 2 years for 66 evaluable patients with severe LAD-I not receiving HSCT  Poster Presentation at ASGCT May 2018  Natural history studies show the correlation between higher CD18 expression and longer patient survival, supporting gene therapy’s potential in LAD-I patients  Source: Almarza Novoa E et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan 20. pii: S2213-2198(17)31026-7. [Epub ahead of print]  Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates by Neutrophil CD18 Expression-Patients with moderate LAD-I not receiving allogeneic HSCT- 
 

 LAD-I: Mouse Study Shows LAD-I Correction  Primary and serially transplanted LAD mice underwent CD18 lenti GTx with different promotersMyeloablative conditioning was usedRocket chose the Chimeric cFES/CTSG (myeloid-specific ) promoter (Post-transplant PB VCN 0.4-0.9)                                   1o   2o  Leon-Rico D, Aldea M, Sanchez-Baltasar R, Mesa-Nuñez C, Record J, Burns SO, Santilli G, Thrasher AJ, Bueren JA, Almarza E. Hum Gene Ther. 2016 Sep;27(9):668-78. doi: 10.1089/hum.2016.016. Epub 2016 May 5. 
 

 LAD-I: Improved Process Produces VCN >2.4  Source: Company data on file  VCN in Liquid Culture  No Transduction Enhancers  With Combination of Transduction Enhancers  Improved Process  Old Process  VCN/cell  Utilizing GMP vector branch 
 

 LAD-I Program Summary  Ultra-rare Disease = Streamlined Regulatory Approach     Potential design & endpoints for approval  Target Patient Population: Severe LAD-I patients (CD18<2%), ~2/3 mortality by 2yControl: Lit review of ~300 pts. (Rocket published*)Potential approval path: Early Endpoint Read: Modest correction of CD18 expression  Efficacy Trials & Registration Status    Registration & study planning on-schedule  3 global sites planned in the US/EU Recruitment underway from around the globeUS PI identifiedIMPD submission planned in 4Q2018 (Spain) PoC data expected in 2019  Product/Manufacturing Optimization    Advancing toward optimization  GMP vector production ongoingVector manufacturing/transduction optimization underwayVCN approx. 2-4 with latest batch (Target VCN>1)Tdx enhancers to further enhance VCN  *Almarza Novoa E, Kasbekar S, Thrasher AJ, Kohn DB, Sevilla J, Nguyen T, Schwartz JD, Bueren JA. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-I: A comprehensive review of all published cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan 20. pii: S2213-2198(17)31026-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.008. 
 

 Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)  Background:PKLR gene mutation → shortage of RBC ATP → hemolytic anemiaCurrent available treatment: transfusions, splenectomyGTx potential market est. >250 patients/year Upcoming Milestones:Rolling IMPD filing planned in early 2019  FA  LAD-I  PKD  IMO  AAV 
 

 PKD Program Summary  Product/Manufacturing Optimization    Positive outlook for near term optimization PoC  Expected effective engraftment requirement < 50% Optimization of vector manufacturing + transduction process in progressVCN now 2-4 range with TDx EnhancersGMP vector production slated to begin 2018   Clinical Efficacy/Registration Status    Registration & study planning on-schedule  Registry efforts underwayRolling IMPD submission in the next 12 monthsUS site and PI identifiedPlan to treat 2 adults, then 2 pediatric patients in Spain18 post-splenectomy, transfusion-dependent patients pre-identified in EU 
 

 Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO)  Background:TCIRG1 gene mutation → dysfunctional osteoclastsBone marrow failure, skeletal deformities, frequent mortality by age 10Current available treatment: HSCTGTx potential market est. >50 patients/year Upcoming Milestones:Clinical trials scheduled to begin in 2019  FA  LAD-I  PKD  IMO  AAV 
 

 AAV Program (Undisclosed)  Background:Monogenic multi-organ disease, death in teens without organ TxVector with on-target MOA, tissue specific tropismCurrent available treatment: Organ TxPrevalence US/EU: 15,000 to 30,000Upcoming Milestones:Preclinical data and disclosure of indication in 2H18Target IND filing in next 12 months  FA  LAD-I  PKD  IMO  AAV 
 

 AAV: Activity in Mouse Model      Wild-type KO + AAV.EGFP KO + AAV.transgene   Undisclosed collaborator data on file 
 

 AAV:  Expression of Missing Protein in KO mice                        3.532.521.510.50  WT  KO  GTx Mid  GTx High  GTx Low  Undisclosed AAV GTx/GAPDH Ratio  Undisclosed collaborator data on file 
 

 Growing IP Portfolio  4 in-licensed patent families for GTx products and related tech    Supporting current pipeline efforts  In-licensed three pending international patent applications filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) for FA, PKD & LAD programsOne pending PCT application for undisclosed AAV-based GTx   Efforts underway to protect and enhance proprietary technology    Securing protection for continued growth  Additional pending patent applications in the US, Europe and Japan relating to devices, methods, and kits for harvesting and genetically modifying target cells 
 

   World-Class Research and Manufacturing Partners  CIBEREl CIEMATFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterIIS FJDLund UniversityMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMolMed S.p.A.Stanford Medical School 
 

   Gaurav Shah, M.D.President & Chief Executive Officer    Jonathan Schwartz, M.D.Chief Medical Officer & Head of Clinical Development    Kinnari Patel, Pharm.D., MBAChief Operating Officer & Head of Development        Led multiple biologics approvals  Spearheaded Kymriah (CART-19) development at Novartis towards approval  Led Opdivo and six rare disease indication approvals  33  Raj Prabhakar, MBASVP, Business Operations & Corporate Strategy  Claudine Prowse, Ph.D.SVP, Head of Corporate Development & IRO  Christopher Ballas, Ph.D.Vice President, Manufacturing  Gayatri R. Rao, M.D., J.D.Vice President, Regulatory Policy and Patient Advocacy          ~17 years cell, gene and biotech Business development   ~20 years capital markets, strategy, corporate development  ~20 years in cell and gene therapy development & manufacturing  7-Year Former Director of FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development   Leadership Team - Expertise in GTx & Rare Diseases Clinical Development 
 

 AAV: First disclosure of indicationLAD-I: Target IMPD filing  Up to Four Programs in the ClinicClinical Data expected in up to Two Programs  Near-Term Potential Clinical Value Drivers   FA: Updated Patient Data Presented at ASGCT