April 29, 2022

Dear Rocket Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), which, in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related public health concerns, will be held virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022 on June 13, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time.

This year, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. As a result, we are mailing to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of our proxy materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions on how each of those stockholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our 2021 Annual Report, and a form of proxy card. All stockholders who do not receive the Notice of Internet Availability, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of proxy materials, will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail unless they have previously requested delivery of proxy materials electronically. Employing this distribution process will expedite the receipt of materials and will help lower our costs and reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials.

The proxy statement describes the formal business that we will transact at the Annual Meeting. At this year’s Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon the following matters:

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees, “FOR” the ratification of EisnerAmper LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and “FOR” the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Please promptly complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card by mail or submit your voting instructions by Internet, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

In light of potential concerns relating to the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, we are holding our Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet. We strongly encourage you to vote your shares by proxy prior to the Annual Meeting and, if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, to do so virtually via the Internet.

On behalf of the Board and the employees of the Company, we thank you for your continued support and look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.

The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 18, 2022. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

You may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022 where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting. You will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting only if you use your control number, which will be included on your Notice of Internet Availability of proxy materials or proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials), to log on to the meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please submit the enclosed proxy or voting instructions by mail, telephone or Internet. Submitting a proxy or voting instructions will not prevent you from attending the Annual Meeting and voting virtually via the Internet. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the meeting on his or her behalf.

The Notice of Internet Availability and the proxy materials are being made available to our stockholders on or about April 29, 2022.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on June 13, 2022. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com and through our website at www.rocketpharma.com.

The following information is provided to each stockholder in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Rocket” or the “Company”) to be held virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022 on Monday, June 13, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time.

The enclosed proxy is for use at the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof. The Company anticipates that the Notice of Internet Availability in connection with these proxy solicitation materials will first be mailed on or about April 29, 2022 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and we will post our proxy materials on the website referenced in the Notice of Internet Availability. As more fully described in the Notice of Internet Availability, all stockholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability or may request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512, and the Company’s website is www.rocketpharma.com.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on June 13, 2022. This Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com and through our website at the address specified above.

As previously disclosed, on January 4, 2018, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (f/k/a Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corporation) completed the reverse merger (the “Reverse Merger”) of its wholly owned subsidiary, Rome Merger Sub (“Merger Sub”), with and into Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (“Private Rocket”), in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of September 12, 2017, by and among the Company, Merger Sub and Private Rocket. As a result of the Reverse Merger, Private Rocket, the surviving company in the Reverse Merger, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and, following the Reverse Merger, the Company changed its corporate name from Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corporation to Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The former executive officers and a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of Inotek resigned concurrent with the closing of the Reverse Merger.

As used in this proxy statement, the “Company,” “Rocket,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the combined company.

We will hold our Annual Meeting on June 13, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The term “Annual Meeting,” as used in this proxy statement, includes any adjournment or postponement of such meeting. You may attend the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022. Stockholders may vote and submit questions while attending the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card (if you received a paper delivery of proxy materials), to enter the Annual Meeting via the Internet. Instructions on how to attend and participate virtually via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of share ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022.

Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, this year’s Annual Meeting will be held solely in a virtual meeting format. We have designed our virtual format to enhance, rather than constrain, stockholder access, participation and communication. For example, the virtual format allows stockholders to communicate with us during the Annual Meeting so they can ask questions of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) or management. During the live Q&A session of the Annual Meeting, we may answer questions as they come in, to the extent relevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, as time permits.

You are receiving these materials because you were one of our stockholders as of the close of business on April 18, 2022, the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. We are soliciting your proxy (i.e., your permission) to vote your shares of common stock upon matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials to our stockholders via the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 29, 2022, we will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K and how to vote.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet rather than printing and mailing the proxy materials. We believe electronic delivery will expedite the receipt of materials and will help lower our costs and reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials. Therefore, a Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed to holders of record and beneficial owners of our common stock on or around April 29, 2022. The Notice of Internet Availability will provide instructions as to how stockholders may access and review the proxy materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and Annual Report on Form 10-K, on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability or, alternatively, how to request that a copy of the proxy materials, including a proxy card, be sent to them by mail. The Notice of Internet Availability will also provide voting instructions. In addition, stockholders of record may request to receive the proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis for future stockholder meetings. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at the website referenced in the Notice of Internet Availability, and our Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on our website, no other information contained on either website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this document.

The Board is soliciting your vote for the Annual Meeting.

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 18, 2022, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On this date, there were 64,522,057 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.

If, on April 18, 2022, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote virtually via the Internet at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card by mail or vote by proxy over the telephone or the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted.

If, on April 18, 2022, your shares were held not in your name with our transfer agent, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. Simply complete and mail the proxy card and voting instructions to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by your broker or bank, if applicable. To vote virtually via the Internet at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of our outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are present at the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy. Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote virtually via the Internet at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy over the telephone or the Internet as instructed below. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the chairman of the Annual Meeting or the holders of a majority of shares present at the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date.

Proposal 1: Election of Directors. The directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of shares present virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of the directors. Plurality means that the individuals who receive the largest number of “FOR” votes cast are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, the nine nominees receiving the most “FOR” votes will be elected as directors. If you “withhold” your vote with respect to one or more of the nominees, your shares will not be included in determining the number of votes cast under the plurality-vote standard and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal, other than the fact that another nominee may receive a greater number of “FOR” votes.

Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The ratification of the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 will require “FOR” votes from a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of shares present virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal.

Proposal 3: The approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, on a non-binding, advisory basis, requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” such matter. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board or the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) but the Board and Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions about executive compensation.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the voting on the proposals referenced above.

Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote. If the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, the broker or nominee may vote the shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “discretionary,” but may not vote the shares with respect to “non-discretionary” matters. Where a broker does not have discretion to vote on a given proposal, the unvoted shares are considered “broker non-votes.”

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you owned as of April 18, 2022.

You may receive more than one proxy card if your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please vote in the manner described below under “How do I vote?” for each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxies on the card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. The Board’s recommendation is set forth together with the description of each item in this proxy statement. The Board recommends a vote:

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board had no knowledge of any business other than that described herein that would be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

For the election of directors (Proposal 1), you may either vote “FOR” all or some of the nominees or you may “WITHHOLD” your vote for any nominee you specify. For the ratification of the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP (Proposal 2), you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or you may “ABSTAIN” from voting. For the non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3), you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or you may “ABSTAIN” from voting. The procedures for voting are as follows:

If you are a stockholder of record, you may (a) vote virtually via the Internet, at the Annual Meeting or (b) vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card by mail or vote by proxy over the telephone or the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote virtually via the Internet even if you have already voted by proxy, as described under “May I change my vote after submitting my proxy card?” below.

If any other matter is presented, the proxies will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no other matters that may be presented at the Annual Meeting, other than those listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. Simply complete and mail the proxy card and voting instructions to ensure that your vote is counted.

Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by your broker, bank or other agent, if applicable. To vote virtually via the Internet at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request a proxy form.

During the Annual Meeting, if you wish to ask a question, you may do so by entering your question in the text box and clicking “submit”. If questions submitted are repetitive as to a particular topic, the Chairman of the meeting may limit discussion on such topic. During the formal portion of the meeting, all questions presented should relate directly to the proposal under discussion. We will also hold a question and answer period at the end of the meeting, as time permits, during which time we welcome questions not relating to specific proposals.

Please review the Annual Meeting’s Rules of Conduct for further details. The Annual Meeting’s Rules of Conduct will be posted on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RCKT2022 prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.

Beginning 15 minutes prior to the start of and during the virtual Annual Meeting, we will have a support team ready to assist stockholders with any technical difficulties they may have accessing or hearing the virtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual shareholder meeting log-in page.

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the stockholder of record of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following four ways:

If your shares are not registered in your own name, you will need the appropriate documentation from the stockholder of record to vote personally at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held by your broker, bank or another party as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by such party. Your personal attendance at the Annual Meeting does not revoke your proxy. Your last vote, prior to or at the Annual Meeting, is the vote that will be counted.

The Company will pay the cost for the solicitation of proxies by the Board. The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail and through Internet access to materials. Proxies may also be solicited personally, by telephone, fax or e-mail by employees of Rocket without any remuneration to such individuals other than their regular compensation. Rocket will also reimburse brokers, banks, custodians, other nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding these materials to their principals to obtain the authorization for the execution of proxies.

Preliminary voting results will be announced at our Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file no later than four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available by the time we file the Form 8-K, we will disclose the preliminary results in the Form 8-K and, within four business days after the final voting results are known to us, file an amended Form 8-K to disclose the final voting results.

Upon the recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”), the Board has nominated Dr. Roderick Wong, Mr. Carsten Boess, Mr. Pedro Granadillo, Dr. Gotham Makker, Dr. Gaurav Shah, Mr. David P. Southwell, Dr. Naveen Yalamanchi, Dr. Elisabeth Björk and Dr. Fady Malik to serve as directors to hold office until the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2023, until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of the foregoing persons currently serves as a director, and each has indicated a willingness to continue to serve as a director.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of shares present virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of the directors. The nine nominees receiving the highest number of “For” votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the nine nominees named above. If any of the nominees become unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, your shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by our Board.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES SET FORTH ABOVE.

The members of the Board as of the date of this proxy statement, together with certain information about them, are set forth below.

There are no arrangements or understanding between any director, or nominee for directorship, pursuant to which such director or nominee was selected as a director or nominee. Additionally, there are no family relationships among our directors, officers, or director-nominees. We know of no reason why any of the nominees may be unable to serve as a director. If any of the nominees are unable to serve, your proxy may vote for another nominee proposed by the Board. If for any reason any of the nominees prove unable or unwilling to stand for election, the Board will nominate alternate(s) or reduce the size of the Board to eliminate the vacancy.

Set forth below are the names, ages as of April 18, 2022, principal occupations, and business experience, as well as their prior service on the Board, of the directors. Unless otherwise indicated, principal occupations shown for each director have extended for five or more years. Stockholders will be voting on the election as directors of all of the individuals below.

Elisabeth Björk, M.D., Ph.D. has served as one of our directors since April 2020. She is currently the Senior Vice President, Head of Late-Stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), Biopharmaceuticals R&D at AstraZeneca, leading the global development of medicines in this area. Prior to taking on this role in June 2012, Dr. Björk had several roles of increasing seniority within AstraZeneca, with responsibility for clinical phases I-IV. She is an endocrinologist by training and an associate professor of medicine at Uppsala University, and was Head of the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit at the University Hospital, Uppsala, where she spent 15 years in clinical practice and diabetes research, before joining AstraZeneca in 2002. She is also a board member of Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmers Ventures AB, Björks Matematik o Mera AB and rfidcompare europe AB. We believe that Dr. Björk’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her depth of knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry and her many years of experience in drug development.

Carsten Boess has served as one of our directors since January 2016. He previously served as Executive Vice President of Corporate Affairs at Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, a publicly-traded biotechnology company and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Synageva Biopharma Corporation from 2011 until the company’s acquisition by Alexion Pharmaceuticals in 2015. Prior to his role at Synageva, Mr. Boess served in multiple roles with increasing responsibility for Insulet Corporation, including Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2009 and Vice President of International Operations from 2009 to 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Boess served as Executive Vice President of Finance for Serono Inc. from 2005 to 2006. In addition, he was a member of the Geneva-based World Wide Executive Finance Management Team while at Serono. Mr. Boess was also Chief Financial Officer at Alexion Pharmaceuticals and was a finance executive at Novozymes of North America and Novo Nordisk in France, Switzerland and China. He is also a board member of Avidity Biosciences and Achilles Therapeutics, a privately held biopharmaceuticals company, as well as Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation 2. Mr. Boess received a Bachelor’s degree and Master’s degree in Economics and Finance, specializing in Accounting and Finance from the University of Odense, Denmark. We believe that Mr. Boess’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his business and financial experience working at pharmaceutical companies.

Pedro Granadillo has served as one of our directors since January 2018. He has over 40 years of biopharmaceutical industry experience with expertise in human resources, manufacturing, quality and corporate governance. From 1970 until his retirement in 2004, Mr. Granadillo held multiple leadership roles at Eli Lilly and Company, including Senior Vice President of Global Manufacturing and Human Resources and a member of the Executive Committee. In addition, Mr. Granadillo currently serves on the board of Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation 2. Mr. Granadillo has previously served on the boards of directors at Haemonetics Corporation, Dendreon Corporation, Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation and Noven Pharmaceuticals, as well as NPS Pharmaceuticals, which sold to Shire for $5.2 billion in 2015. He graduated from Purdue University with a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering. We believe that Mr. Granadillo’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his depth of knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry and his many years of experience serving on the boards of directors of healthcare companies.

Gotham Makker, M.D. has served as one of our directors since January 2018. Dr. Makker has over 20 years of healthcare industry experience. Dr. Makker currently serves as head of Strategic Investments for RTW Investments, LP (“RTW”), a position he has held since 2019. From 2005 to 2019, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Simran Investment Group, LLC, a closely held equity investment fund. Prior to Simran, Dr. Makker was a healthcare portfolio manager and principal at Citadel Investment Group LLC, a position he held from 2002 to 2005. Prior to joining Citadel, Dr. Makker served as an analyst at Oracle Partners LP covering biotechnology and medical device sectors from 2000 to 2001. From 1999 to 2000, Dr. Makker was a senior analyst on the life sciences investment banking team at Hambrecht & Quist. Dr. Makker has previously served on the board of directors of Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation. Dr. Makker received an M.D. from the University of Nebraska Medical School, and he completed the Sarnoff cardiovascular research fellowship at Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons and at Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women’s Hospital. We believe that Dr. Makker’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his years of experience in, and extensive knowledge of, the healthcare industry.

Fady Malik, M.D., Ph.D. has served as one of our directors since March 2022. Dr. Malik has served as the Executive Vice President of Research and Development at Cytokinetics, Inc. since November 2015, and he has been with Cytokinetics since its inception in 1998. Prior to taking on his current role in 2015, Dr. Malik had several other roles of increasing seniority within Cytokinetics, including serving as the Senior Vice President of Research and Development from August 2014 to November 2015, as the Senior Vice President of Research and Early Development from June 2012 to August 2014 and as Vice President, Biology from March 2008 to June 2012, all of which roles were focused towards building Cytokinetics’ cardiovascular and skeletal muscle programs from their conception. In addition, since 2000, Dr. Malik has held an appointment in the Cardiology Division of the University of California, San Francisco, where he is currently a Clinical Professor. Dr. Malik is a cardiologist by training, and he was a practicing Interventional Cardiologist at the San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center for over 18 years. Dr. Malik received a B.S. from the University of California at Berkeley, a Ph.D. from the University of California at San Francisco and his M.D. from the University of California at San Francisco. We believe that Dr. Malik’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his depth of knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry and his many years of experience in clinical research and drug development.

Gaurav Shah, M.D. has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as one of our directors since January 2018. Dr. Shah was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Private Rocket in September 2015. Prior to joining Private Rocket, from 2011-2015, Dr. Shah held various leadership positions at Novartis including Global Program Head for CART-19, Global Clinical Program Head for CTL-019 and Biosimilars, and Global Clinical Leader for Afinitor. Prior to Novartis, he spent three years at Eli Lilly and Company as Medical Director overseeing clinical development of numerous programs including olaratumab. During his industry tenure, he has participated in several drug development programs resulting in successful regulatory approvals, such as CTL-019 in pediatric ALL, the first cell and gene therapy approved in the U.S., and successful commercial launches. He also serves on the boards of privately-held Talaris Therapeutics and Altheia Science. Prior to joining industry, Dr. Shah was Assistant Professor of Medicine/Oncology at Columbia University. He holds a B.A. in Behavioral Neuroscience from Harvard University and an M.D. from Columbia University. Dr. Shah completed his internal medicine residency at Brigham & Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School and completed his hematology/oncology fellowship training at the Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We believe Dr. Shah is qualified to serve on our Board due to his role as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and his significant leadership and management experience in the biopharmaceutical industry.

David P. Southwell has served as one of our directors since August 2014. He serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and board member of TScan Therapeutics. Mr. Southwell previously served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Inotek from July 2014 to January 2018. From March 2010 to October 2012, Mr. Southwell served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., which is owned by GlaxoSmithKline plc. Prior to his time at Human Genome Sciences, Mr. Southwell served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sepracor Inc. from July 1994 to July 2008. Mr. Southwell has also served on the board of directors of PTC Therapeutics Inc. since December 2005 and Spero Therapeutics, Inc. from February 2018 to April 2019. Mr. Southwell received a B.A. from Rice University and an M.B.A. from Dartmouth College, where he served on the Board of Overseers from 2011 to 2020. We believe that Mr. Southwell’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his broad experience serving on the boards of directors of public companies, his specific experience with public therapeutics companies and his executive leadership, managerial and business experience.

Roderick Wong, M.D. has served as Chairman of our Board since January 2018. Dr. Wong served as the Chairman of the Board for Private Rocket from July 2015 until January 2018. Dr. Wong has over 15 years of healthcare investment experience. Since 2010, he has served as Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of RTW, a healthcare-centered investment firm. He also serves on the board of Avidity Biosciences and Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation 2. Prior to RTW, Dr. Wong was a Managing Director and the Portfolio Manager for the Davidson Kempner Healthcare Funds. Prior to joining Davidson Kempner, Dr. Wong held various healthcare investment and healthcare research roles at SAC Capital Company and Cowen & Company. Dr. Wong previously served on the board of directors of Penwest Pharmaceuticals and Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation. He received an M.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Medical School, received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, and graduated with a B.S. in Economics from Duke University. We believe that Dr. Wong is qualified to serve on our Board due to his service prior to the closing of the Reverse Merger as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Private Rocket and his years of experience in, and extensive knowledge of, the biopharmaceutical industry.

Naveen Yalamanchi, M.D. has served as one of our directors since January 2018. Dr. Yalamanchi joined Private Rocket as a director in July 2015. Dr. Yalamanchi has over 15 years of healthcare investment and research experience. Since 2015, Dr. Yalamanchi has served as Partner and Portfolio Manager at RTW, a healthcare-centered investment firm. Prior to RTW, Dr. Yalamanchi was Vice-President and co-portfolio manager at Calamos Arista Partners, a subsidiary of Calamos Investments, a position he held from 2012 to 2015. Prior to joining Calamos Arista Partners, Dr. Yalamanchi held various healthcare investment roles at Millennium Management and Davidson Kempner Capital Management. Dr. Yalamanchi holds a B.S. in Biology from MIT and an M.D. from Stanford University. He completed his surgery internship at UCLA Medical Center. Dr. Yalamanchi has previously served on the board of directors of Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation, and currently serves on the board of directors of Health Sciences Acquisitions Corporation 2. We believe that Dr. Yalamanchi is qualified to serve on our Board due to his service prior to the closing of the Reverse Merger as a member of the Board of Directors of Private Rocket and his years of experience in, and extensive knowledge of, the healthcare industry.

We believe that it is important that our Board is composed of individuals reflecting the diversity of our employees, stockholders and the communities we serve. In recent years, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has taken this priority to heart. We provide the below enhanced disclosure regarding the diversity of our Board, utilizing the template in accordance with the board diversity listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Market (“Nasdaq”).

The following table identifies our executive officers and sets forth their current position(s) and their ages as of April 18, 2022.

You should refer to “Nominees for Election as Directors” above for information about our Chief Executive Officer, Gaurav Shah, M.D. Biographical information for our other executive officers, as of April 18, 2022, is set forth below.

Jonathan Schwartz, M.D. joined us as Chief Medical Officer in January 2018 in connection with the Reverse Merger. Dr. Schwartz joined Private Rocket in January 2016 and served as Chief Medical Officer and Head of Clinical Development. Dr. Schwartz is responsible for leading our medical and program development. Dr. Schwartz has over 20 years of combined clinical practice and drug development experience. Prior to Private Rocket, Dr. Schwartz was Vice-President of Clinical Development at Stemline Therapeutics, where he oversaw development efforts for anticancer, vaccine and small-molecule platforms, a position he held since 2014. Prior to Stemline, he spent seven years at Eli Lilly and Company in several leadership positions, including Vice-President of Clinical Science, where he led development teams for numerous drug programs including ramucirumab.

Previously, Dr. Schwartz was Associate Professor of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, specializing in the treatment and translational research of hepatobiliary malignancies and also served as Director for the Hematology-Oncology Fellowship training program. He has a B.A. in American Civilization from Brown University and an M.D. from Washington University (St. Louis). He completed post-graduate Internal Medicine and Hematology-Oncology training at the Mount Sinai and New York Presbyterian Hospitals.

Kinnari Patel, Pharm.D., M.B.A. joined us in January 2018 in connection with the Reverse Merger, and currently holds the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. Dr. Patel joined Private Rocket in April 2016, serving as Vice President - Head of Regulatory, Pharmacoviligence and Quality from April 2016 to July 2017, as Senior Vice President, Global Program Head and Head of Regulatory and Quality from August 2017 to December 2017, and Chief Operating Officer and Head of Development from January 2018 to February 2021.

Prior to joining Private Rocket, Dr. Patel was the Global Regulatory Lead at AstraZeneca from January 2015 to April 2016. Prior to that, Dr. Patel was Head of U.S. Risk Management at Bristol-Meyers Squibb from May 2014 through January 2015 and the U.S. Liaison for Global Regulatory Sciences at Bristol-Meyers Squibb from November 2010 to April 2014. Dr. Patel received the dual degrees of B.S. in Biology and Doctorate of Pharmacy from the USciences in Philadelphia, PA. She also completed a two-year Post-Doctoral Regulatory Affairs Fellowship through Rutgers University. She received her Executive M.B.A. from NYU Stern School of Business with specialization in Corporate Finance, Leadership and Strategy. Most recently, she graduated from the C-Suite Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program.

John Militello, CPA joined as the Company’s Controller in January 2018 and is currently the VP of Finance, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and interim Principal Financial Officer. Before joining the Company, Mr. Militello served as the Vice President of Finance and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer with Immune Pharmaceuticals Inc. from April 2015 to November 2017. Prior to that Mr. Militello was an Assistant Controller with Travere Therapeutics, formerly Retrophin, Inc. (NASDAQ GM: TVTX), a San Diego based biotech company, and the Manager, External Reporting & Compliance at Volt Information Sciences, Inc. (NYSE MKT: VOLT), a publicly traded staffing company. Prior to Volt Information Sciences, Inc., Mr. Militello was a Senior Manager in the biotech practice of BDO USA, LLP serving multi-national SEC registrants. Mr. Militello is a Certified Public Accountant and earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from St. Joseph’s College.

Martin Wilson, J.D. joined Rocket as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer in November 2021. Mr. Wilson has nearly 20 years of legal, compliance and executive experience and accomplishment within the life sciences industry. Before Rocket, Mr. Wilson was General Counsel and Chief Corporate Officer at Ichnos Sciences.

The Board oversees our business and monitors the performance of our management. In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the Board does not involve itself in the day-to-day operations of the Company. Our executive officers and management oversee the day-to-day operations. Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending meetings of the Board, which are held from time to time.

The Board held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2021, each director then in office attended at least 75% of the total of (i) the meetings of the Board held during the period for which he or she has been a director and (ii) the meetings of the committee(s) on which that director served during such period. Each of our directors then in office attended our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. It is our policy to encourage our directors to attend the Annual Meeting.

The Board is also focused on overboarding concerns and strongly believes that all directors have sufficient time and attention to devote to Board duties and to otherwise fulfill the responsibilities required of directors. Prior to recommending a candidate as a nominee for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the candidate’s professional commitments, including the number of boards on which the candidate serves and considers whether those commitments may limit the ability of the candidate to devote sufficient time and attention to Board duties. Although Mr. Southwell may be deemed overboarded based on the criteria adopted by certain of our institutional investors, neither the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee nor the Board

believes that Mr. Southwell’s outside board or other professional commitments currently or have ever limited his ability to devote sufficient time and attention to Board duties.

Under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must compose a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, applicable Nasdaq rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating committees must be independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq rules. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. In making this determination, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director. As a result of this review, our Board determined that each of Dr. Björk, Mr. Boess, Mr. Granadillo, Dr. Makker, Dr. Malik, Dr. Southwell, and Dr. Yalamanchi qualify as “independent” directors within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules. As required under applicable Nasdaq rules, our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. Dr. Wong is the current Chairman of our Board and is not considered an independent director due to his role as chairman of an affiliate, RTW, and his continued role as an employee of the Company. Consistent with Nasdaq listing requirements, the independent directors regularly have the opportunity to meet in executive sessions without Dr. Wong and Dr. Shah in attendance. The purpose of these executive sessions is to promote open and candid discussion among the independent directors. We do not have a lead independent director.

The Board has three committees: an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Audit Committee held four meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meetings. Continuing directors and our nominees for election as director are strongly encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders and to participate in our committee meetings. The following table provides membership information for each committee:

The members of the Audit Committee are Dr. Elisabeth Björk, Mr. Carsten Boess and Mr. Pedro Granadillo. Mr. Boess serves as chair of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq and which is available on our website at www.rocketpharma.com/corporate-governance/. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.

Our Board has determined that Dr. Björk, Mr. Boess and Mr. Granadillo are independent as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In addition, our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, and that Mr. Boess qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. In making this

determination, our Board has considered the formal education and nature and scope of their previous experience, coupled with past and present service on various audit committees. The responsibilities of our Audit Committee include, among other things:

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 with management and our registered public accounting firm, EisnerAmper LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with EisnerAmper LLP the matters required by the applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from EisnerAmper LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EisnerAmper LLP’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with EisnerAmper LLP the firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Audit Committee

The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Pedro Granadillo and Dr. Naveen Yalamanchi. Dr. Yalamanchi serves as chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Board has determined that all members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as independence is currently defined in Section 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of Nasdaq and which is available on our website at www.rocketpharma.com/corporate-governance/. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.

The responsibilities of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically determines the qualifications, qualities, skills and other expertise required to be a director and develops, subject to approval by the full Board, criteria to be considered in selecting nominees for director. Among other things, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers whether the Board reflects the balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, integrity, ability to make analytical inquiries, and diversity as a whole that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate and assess the effectiveness of this policy/goal during the Board’s annual evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a policy regarding the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. The process followed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to current directors and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and

background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may use outside consultants to assist in identifying or evaluating candidates. Final approval of director candidates is determined by the full Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider qualified nominations for directors recommended by stockholders. In general, stockholder recommendations are evaluated on the same basis as any recommendation from members of the Board or management of the Company. Recommendations should be sent to our Secretary, c/o Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512. For additional information about our director nomination requirements, please see “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” and our amended and restated by-laws.

The members of our Compensation Committee are Mr. Carsten Boess, Mr. Pedro Granadillo and Dr. Naveen Yalamanchi. Mr. Granadillo serves as chairman of the Compensation Committee. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent as independence is currently defined in Section 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of Nasdaq and which is available on our website at www.rocketpharma.com/corporate-governance/. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.

The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include, among other things:

As part of its process for approving or recommending to the Board the compensation for our senior executives other than our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, but only to the extent consistent with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated by-laws, Nasdaq rules, and other applicable law. In addition, pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive and director compensation. Since October 2016, the Compensation Committee has directly engaged a compensation consultant to assist with matters relating to senior executive and director compensation. The Compensation Committee requested that its compensation consultant:

The Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant ultimately developed recommendations that were presented to the Compensation Committee for its consideration. These recommendations covered the executive and Board pay programs. Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC (“Semler Brossy”) has served as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant since June 2019. Pursuant to the factors set forth in Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act, the Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of Semler Brossy, and conducted a conflicts of interest assessment (taking into consideration factors specified in the Nasdaq listing standards) on Semler Brossy. The Compensation Committee concluded that Semler Brossy is independent and their work for the Compensation Committee has not raised any conflicts of interest. No other fees were paid to Semler Brossy except fees related to their services to the Compensation Committee.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Carsten Boess, Mr. Pedro Granadillo and Dr. Naveen Yalamanchi. No member of our Compensation Committee then in service had ever been an officer or employee of the Company or had any other relationship requiring disclosure herein. None of our executive officers then in office served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that had one or more of its officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Dr. Roderick Wong currently serves as chairman of our Board. Our Board has determined that its current structure, with separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders at this time. The Board believes that this governance structure promotes balance between the Board’s independent authority to oversee our business and the Chief Executive Officer and his management team who manage the business on a day-to-day basis. Our Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for us, given Dr. Wong’s extensive knowledge and understanding of the biopharmaceutical industry and his ability to effectively identify strategic priorities for the Company. Furthermore, our Board believes that Dr. Wong’s qualifications to be our Chairman include his significant experience as a healthcare investor in all stages of the lifecycle of biopharmaceutical companies.

Risk assessment and oversight are an integral part of our governance and management processes. Our Board encourages management to promote a culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Management discusses strategic and operational risks at regular management meetings, and conducts specific strategic planning and review sessions during the year that include a focused discussion and analysis of the risks facing the Company. Throughout the year, senior management reviews these risks with the Board at regular Board meetings as part of management presentations that focus on particular business functions, operations or strategies, and presents the steps taken by management to mitigate or eliminate such risks.

Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through our Board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, and our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our significant financial and operational risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures.

The Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including managing violations of our code of business conduct and ethics, and considers and approves or disapproves any

related-person transactions. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines. Our Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies or programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking.

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.rocketpharma.com/corporate-governance/, under the corporate governance tab on our website. We intend to satisfy applicable disclosure requirements regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website at the Internet address set forth above within four business days following the date of amendment or waiver. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement.

Stockholders wishing to communicate directly with our Board may send correspondence to our Secretary, c/o Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512. Our Secretary will relay the information received to the Board. Stockholders may also visit our website at www.rocketpharma.com and select “Contact Us” to communicate online with us.

The Company’s stockholders are being asked by the Audit Committee to ratify the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. EisnerAmper LLP has served as the independent registered public accounting firm for Private Rocket since 2016 and was appointed to be the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company on March 16, 2018. The Audit Committee is solely responsible for selecting the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and stockholder approval is not required to appoint EisnerAmper LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. However, the Board believes that submitting the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP to the stockholders for ratification is good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain EisnerAmper LLP. If the selection of EisnerAmper LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time it decides that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Representatives of EisnerAmper LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. These representatives will be provided an opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

The proposal to ratify the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against the proposal at the Annual Meeting by holders of shares present virtually via the Internet or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF EISNERAMPER LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by its independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval may be given as part of the Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm or on an individual case-by-case basis. All of the services described below were approved by our Audit Committee.

The following table presents aggregate fees billed for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 for professional services rendered by EisnerAmper LLP in the categories listed below.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Our Board is providing our stockholders with an opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. As described below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, we have developed a compensation program that is designed to motivate employees to achieve short-term and long-term results that are in the best interests of our stockholders. We believe our compensation policy strikes an appropriate balance between the implementation of responsible, measured compensation practices and the effective provision of incentives for our named executive officers to exert their best efforts for our success.

We are asking for stockholder approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, which includes the disclosures under the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below, including the compensation tables and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

The following resolution will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

“BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Company’s stockholders hereby approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables.”

As this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board or the Compensation Committee, and neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of this vote. However, the Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of this vote when considering future executive compensation policies and decisions.

For approval, this proposal must receive the affirmative vote of the majority of shares properly cast on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal No. 3.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 3 TO APPROVE, ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

Our Board does not know of any other matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters not mentioned in this proxy statement are properly brought before the meeting, the appropriate executive officers and directors named in this proxy statement intend to use their discretionary voting authority under the proxy to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on those matters.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of the material elements of our executive compensation program during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (“fiscal 2021”) for the following “named executive officers,” whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained in this proxy statement:

This section also discusses our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design; how and why the Compensation Committee arrived at the specific compensation policies and decisions during fiscal 2021; the role of Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant; and the peer group used in evaluating executive compensation.

We are a clinical-stage, multi-platform biotechnology company focused on the development of first, only and best-in-class gene therapies, with direct on-target mechanism of action and clear clinical endpoints for rare and devastating diseases. We have three clinical-stage ex vivo lentiviral vector programs. These include programs for Fanconi Anemia (“FA”), a genetic defect in the bone marrow that reduces production of blood cells or promotes the production of faulty blood cells, Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (“LAD-I”), a genetic disorder that causes the immune system to malfunction, and Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (“PKD”), a rare red blood cell autosomal recessive disorder that results in chronic non-spherocytic hemolytic anemia. Of these, both the Phase 2 FA program and the Phase 1/2 LAD-I program are in registration-enabling studies in the United States (“U.S.”) and Europe (“EU”). In addition, in the U.S., we have a clinical stage in vivo adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) program for Danon disease, a multi-organ lysosomal-associated disorder leading to early death due to heart failure. Additional work on a gene therapy program for the less common FA subtypes C and G is ongoing. We have global commercialization and development rights to all of these product candidates under royalty-bearing license agreements.

Effective December 2021, the Company made a decision to no longer pursue Rocket-sponsored clinical evaluation of RP-L401 targeting infantile malignant osteopetrosis; this program is to be returned to academic innovators. Although we believe that gene therapy may be beneficial to patients afflicted with this disorder, we have opted to focus available resources towards advancement of our Danon disease, FA, LAD-I and PKD programs, based on the compelling clinical data to date and potential for therapeutic advancement in these severe disorders of childhood and young adulthood.

In fiscal 2021, we achieved significant financial and business results, including:

In fiscal 2021, the key highlights of our executive compensation program included:

Our stockholders have the opportunity annually to cast a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. Consistent with the recommendation of our Board and the preference of our stockholders as reflected in the non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future “Say On Pay” votes conducted at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we intend to provide for annual non-binding, advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. The next non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future non-binding, advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers will occur no later than our 2027 annual meeting of stockholders.

At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, our Say On Pay proposal was approved by approximately 98.7% of the votes cast. While we view the strong support expressed in the Say on Pay proposal as a general endorsement of our compensation program, we believe that it is constructive to have an ongoing dialogue with our stockholders and intend to take the views of our stockholders into consideration when making future decisions about executive compensation.

We have designed our executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives:

We believe that our executive compensation program should include short-term and long-term elements and should reward consistent performance in achieving the corporate and strategic objectives that support long-term value creation. We evaluate both performance and compensation to ensure that the compensation provided to our executive officers remains competitive relative to compensation paid by similar companies operating in the biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industry, in particular our peer companies, taking into account the role and performance of the individual executive and the performance and strategic objectives of Rocket Pharmaceuticals.

Our executive compensation and corporate governance program are designed to link pay with operational performance and increase long-term stockholder value while striking a responsible balance between risk and reward. To accomplish these objectives, we have adopted the following policies and practices over time:

The compensation arrangements for our executive officers consist of base salary, performance-based cash incentives, equity awards, and broad-based welfare and health benefit programs. While we offer cash compensation in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentives, we intend equity compensation to be the central component of our executive compensation program.

We emphasize the use of equity to provide incentives for our executive officers to focus on the growth of our overall enterprise value and, correspondingly, to create value for our stockholders. The longer term nature of equity mirrors the long-term investment in bringing new therapies to market, and incentivizes continuity of leadership over the long term. Historically, we have provided equity compensation primarily in the form of stock options because we believe that stock options serve as an effective performance incentive for our executive officers because the executive officer derives value only if our stock price increases. The Compensation Committee intends to review our equity compensation program on at least an annual basis with input from its independent compensation consultant and to evaluate the appropriate equity incentive design and vehicle to ensure that our equity compensation program continues to support our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented executive officers necessary for the success of our business.

The Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation program annually. As part of this review process, the Compensation Committee applies the objectives described above within the context of our overall compensation philosophy while simultaneously considering the compensation levels needed to ensure our executive compensation program remains competitive based on input from and market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee also evaluates whether we are meeting our retention objectives and the potential cost of replacing key executive officers.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing, evaluating, and approving the compensation arrangements of our executive officers and for establishing and maintaining our executive compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee seeks input and receives recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer when discussing the performance and compensation of other executive officers, and in

determining the financial and accounting implications of our compensation programs and hiring decisions. The Compensation Committee is authorized to engage its own independent advisors to provide advice on matters related to executive compensation and general compensation programs. For additional information on our Compensation Committee, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance-Board Committees” elsewhere in this proxy statement.

In fiscal 2021, our CEO and human resources team assisted the Compensation Committee in evaluating the performance of our other executive officers and making recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to base salary adjustments, target annual cash incentive opportunities, actual cash incentive award payments, and equity awards for each executive officer. While the Compensation Committee takes these recommendations into consideration, it exercises its own independent judgment in approving the compensation of our executive officers. In setting compensation for the CEO, the Compensation Committee consults with the full Board, excluding the CEO.

In fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy to provide advice regarding our executive compensation program. Pursuant to this engagement, Semler Brossy performed the following projects for the Compensation Committee:

Semler Brossy does not provide any other services to us. Semler Brossy maintains a conflict of interest policy that is specifically designed to prevent any conflicts of interest. In addition, the Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Semler Brossy considering, among other things, the factors set forth in Exchange Act rules and the Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that no conflict of interest exists with respect to Semler Brossy’s engagement by the Compensation Committee.

In January 2021, following positive clinical trial data and an associated increase in our market capitalization, the Compensation Committee identified a compensation peer group designed to reflect companies that are in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors, with similar company stage, pipeline, headcount and mid-level market capitalization. At the time of the group’s approval, we had a market capitalization slightly above and a headcount below the median for the compensation peer group. Our compensation peer group for fiscal 2021 consisted of the following companies:

Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.

Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Beam Therapeutics Inc.

bluebird bio, Inc.

CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Editas Medicine, Inc.

Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

REGENXBIO Inc.

Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc.

UniQure N.V.

The Compensation Committee considers the compensation levels of the executives at the companies in our compensation peer group to provide general guidance and a benchmark for market practices, without rigidly setting compensation based on specific percentiles relative to the peer group.

Our executive compensation program consists of three principal components:

In fiscal 2021, approximately 93% of our CEO’s and about 89% on average of our other named executive officers’ total target compensation consisted of “at-risk” and/or performance-based compensation.

We offer base salaries that are intended to provide a stable level of fixed compensation to our executive officers for performance of their day-to-day responsibilities. Each executive officer’s base salary was originally established as the result of arm’s-length negotiation with the individual at the time of his or her initial hiring. Base salaries for our executive officers are reviewed annually to determine whether an adjustment is warranted to reflect changes in market conditions or other factors, including changing responsibilities as our executive officers’ positions evolve. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our named executive officers and, after considering analysis performed by Semler Brossy, determined to increase base salaries, effective as of January 1, 2021, for certain of our named executive officers in recognition of strong performance by the named executive officers and to better align base salaries with base salaries for similarly situated executives in our peer group. The base salaries for our named executive officers during fiscal 2021 are set forth below.

We provide our executive officers with the opportunity to receive annual cash incentives that are intended to encourage the achievement of corporate performance objectives, in particular corporate targets relating to advancing the clinical pipeline, building our R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, and growing and sustaining the Company. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the target cash incentive amounts of our named executive officers. The fiscal 2021 target cash incentive amounts for our named executive officers, both in dollars and as a percentage of base salary are set forth below.

In January 2021, the Compensation Committee set the corporate performance objectives for fiscal 2021 annual cash incentives as set forth below:

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company had achieved the corporate goals for fiscal 2021 at 90% of target levels and funded the bonus pool at that level.

In addition, the Compensation Committee assessed the individual performance of each of the named executive officers who was then serving other than the CEO, for whom the Compensation Committee believes the annual cash incentive bonus should be based entirely upon achievement of the corporate performance objectives. For each of the other named executive officers, their annual bonus for 2021 was determined by multiplying their target cash incentive amount by first their individual multiplier, and then the company multiplier. As a new employee, Mr. Wilson’s pro-rated attainment was based on an individual multiplier equal to the corporate multiplier of 90%. The Compensation Committee determined that, for individual performance: Mr. Garcia-Parada achieved 90% of target, Dr. Patel achieved 95% of target, and Dr. Schwartz achieved 92.5% of target. In making its determinations regarding individual performance, the Compensation Committee considered the following achievements in 2021 for each of the named executive officers other than the CEO:

In light of such achievement, the Compensation Committee determined to award annual cash incentive awards to the named executive officers as set forth in the following table.

We believe that strong long-term corporate performance is achieved with a compensation program that encourages a long-term focus by our executive officers through the use of equity compensation, the value of which depends on the performance of our common stock. For this reason, our long-term incentive compensation to date has been provided largely in the form of equity awards. Historically, we have used stock options to help align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to enable them to participate in the appreciation of our common stock. For the 2021 grant, the Compensation Committee believed that stock options served as the most effective performance incentive for our executive officers at the time, since the executive officer derives value only if our stock price increases.

The size and form of the equity awards for our executive officers are determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee at a level that it believes is competitive with current market conditions (as reflected by our compensation peer group), and after taking into consideration each individual executive officer’s role and the scope of his or her responsibilities, his or her experience, his or her past performance and expected future contributions, his or her current equity holdings and the potential equity awards of our other executive officers.

When determining the size of equity awards, the Compensation Committee considers the number of underlying shares granted, with a reference to the executive’s total percentage ownership in the Company, and it also considers prior year performance as an input into decision-making.

For fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee determined to grant each of our executive officers stock options that vest over three years, with one-third vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments over the following two years. The table below provides information regarding the number of shares underlying stock options granted to each named executive officer in fiscal 2021 and the aggregate grant date fair value of such equity awards. As of year-end, all options granted to our executive officers in 2021 were “underwater” based on the year-end stock price of $21.83.

The Compensation Committee undertook a holistic evaluation of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation strategy over the course of 2021. In particular, the Committee felt it was an appropriate time to evaluate the extent to which the quickly evolving talent landscape in the biopharma and biotechnology spaces necessitate changes to the grant approach at the Company.

The Compensation Committee determined at the conclusion of this evaluation that the incorporation of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) into the long-term incentive program would be competitive with grant practices at its peer companies and create further long-term alignment between executive officers and stockholders. However, the Compensation Committee also felt it appropriate to maintain the majority of the long-term incentive program in the form of stock options given their inherent performance-based nature (through the exercise price). To that end, the equity grant mix to our executive officers for 2022 was 67% in the form of stock options and 33% in the form of RSUs.

As part of its annual review of long-term incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed the long-term incentive compensation level for the CEO in February 2022. Based upon the Company’s performance in 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that the aggregate target value of Mr. Shah’s 2022 equity awards would be $5.5 million, a decrease of approximately 21% year-over-year.

Our employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) plan and health and welfare programs, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to our employees generally, including our named executive officers and their families. We adjust our employee benefit programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other U.S. full-time employees.

Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not generally provide perquisites to our executive team. In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where we believe it is

appropriate to assist an individual executive in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive team more efficient and effective and for recruitment, motivation or retention purposes. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be subject to review and approval by our Compensation Committee.

We have entered into post-employment compensation arrangements with certain of our named executive officers as described in more detail in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

In determining payment and benefit levels under the various circumstances covered by such post-employment compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee has drawn a distinction between voluntary terminations of employment, terminations of employment for cause, and involuntary terminations of employment both in connection with or not involving a change in control of the Company. Payment in the latter circumstances has been deemed appropriate in light of the benefits to us described above, as well as the likelihood that the executive officer’s departure is due, at least in part, to circumstances not within his or her control. In contrast, we believe that payments are generally not appropriate in the event of a voluntary resignation or a termination of employment for cause because such events often reflect either an affirmative decision by the executive officer to end his or her relationship with us or inadequate performance.

The post-employment compensation arrangements with certain of our named executive officers also contain certain specified payments and benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment in connection with a change in control of the Company. We believe that these arrangements are designed to align the interests of management and stockholders when considering the long-term future for the Company. The primary purpose of these arrangements is to keep our most senior executive officers focused on pursuing all corporate transaction activity that is in the best interests of stockholders regardless of whether those transactions may result in their own job loss. Reasonable post-acquisition payments and benefits should serve the interests of both the executive officer and our stockholders.

We do not provide any executive officer, including any named executive officer, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the executive officer may owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

In March 2021, our Board adopted a clawback policy that covers incentive compensation paid to our employees. The policy provides our Board or Compensation Committee may require an employee to repay to us compensation in the following circumstances: (i) as required by Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (ii) as required by Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act; (iii) as required by any other applicable law, regulation or regulatory requirement; (iv) if we suffer significant financial loss, reputational damage or similar adverse impact as a result of actions taken or decisions made by the employee in circumstances constituting illegal or intentionally wrongful conduct, or gross negligence; or (v) if the employee is awarded or is paid out under the Second Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) and any successor plan, or any other incentive compensation plan of the Company on the basis of significantly incorrect financial calculations or information or if events coming to light after the award or payout would have significantly reduced the amount of the award or payout if known at the time of the award or payout.

In March, 2021, we adopted a stock ownership guidelines that are applicable to non-employee directors and executive officers who are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The stock ownership policy requires that non-employee directors hold equity in the Company with a value equal to at least the director’s annual Board cash retainer, the Chief Executive Officer own equity in the company equal to at least three times his annual base salary and that all other covered executive officers own equity in the company equal to at least his or her annual base salary. The stock ownership policy provides for a phase-in period, which is generally three years for non-employee directors and five years for executive officers. The stock ownership policy also includes certain share retention obligations that apply to officers and directors who have not met the minimum equity ownership requirements by the end of their phase-in period or who cease to hold the minimum equity ownership at any time following such date.

The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy governing equity awards that are granted to our non-executive employees. Equity awards to our executive officers or members of the Board must be approved either by the Board or the Compensation Committee at a meeting or by unanimous written consent. This policy provides that the CEO may make awards to non-executive employees within prescribed limits. Generally, equity awards will be effective on the first Monday of the month following the employee’s start date, or for grants to existing employees, the date of approval. The exercise price of all stock options and stock appreciation rights must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

Our insider trading policy applies to all employees, including our executive officers, and members of our Board and prohibits any hedging and monetization transactions that transfer, with respect to equity compensation all or a portion of the risk of a decline in the market price of shares of Company common stock. Instruments that would be considered to be a “hedge” include prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds. In addition, employees and members of our Board may not engage in short sales or transactions in publicly traded options on Company securities, such as puts, calls, and other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market. Further, such persons are prohibited from entering into loans or other arrangements where Company securities are pledged as collateral, except as may be approved by our full Board. Standing orders may only be used only for a very brief period of time.

Our insider trading policy generally requires that our executive officers and members of our Board may not trade in our equity securities during “blackout” periods and that such individuals must pre-clear trades or adopt plans in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 for sales of securities which they beneficially own.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed our executive and employee compensation programs, and does not believe that our compensation policies and practices encourage undue or inappropriate risk taking or create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The reasons for the Compensation Committee’s determination include the following:

Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive

compensation, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award and pay compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation and to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.

We account for stock compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance set forth in FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires companies to measure and recognize the compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options and RSU awards, over the period during which the award recipient is required to perform services in exchange for the award.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be incorporated by reference in Rocket Pharmaceutical’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021 and included in this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee

 

Pedro Granadillo (Chair)

Carsten Boess

Naveen Yalamanchi

The following table sets forth the total compensation awarded to or earned by our NEOs during the fiscal years indicated.

The following table shows information regarding grants of plan-based awards during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 to the Company’s named executive officers.

The following table provides information concerning outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2021.

The following table sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information with respect to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2021.

In October 2018, the Company entered into Severance and Change in Control Agreements (the “Severance Agreements”) with Gaurav D. Shah, M.D., Kinnari Patel, Pharm.D., M.B.A. and Jonathan Schwartz, M.D.

The Severance Agreements provide the executives with certain severance benefits upon certain qualifying terminations of employment.

In connection with a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company for Cause or by the executive without Good Reason (each as defined below), the executive is not entitled to any severance payments or benefits and is only entitled to receive (i) any accrued but unpaid base salary and accrued but unused vacation, (ii) any unpaid annual bonus with respect to any completed fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination (provided, however, that if the executive is terminated for Cause, such bonus shall be forfeited), (iii) reimbursement for unreimbursed business expenses, and (iv) employee benefits, if any, to which the executive may be entitled as of the date of termination ((i) through (iv) collectively, the “Accrued Amounts”).

In connection with a termination of the executive’s employment with the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, the executive is entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts and, upon execution of an irrevocable release of claims in favor of the Company, (i) a lump sum payment equal to, in the case of Dr. Patel and Dr. Schwartz, nine months and, in the case of Dr. Shah, 12 months, of the executive’s annual base salary for the year in which termination occurs and (ii) if timely elected, in the case of Dr. Patel and Dr. Schwartz, nine months and, in the case of Dr. Shah, 12 months, of Company-paid COBRA benefits.

In connection with a termination of the executive’s employment with the Company without Cause (other than on account of the executive’s death or Disability) or by the executive for Good Reason within 12 months following a Change in Control (as defined below), the executive is entitled to receive, upon execution of an irrevocable release of claims in favor of the Company, (i) the Accrued Amounts, (ii) a lump sum payment equal to, in the case of Dr. Patel and Dr. Schwartz, 12 months and, in the case of Dr. Shah, 18 months, of the executive’s annual base salary for the year in which termination occurs, (iii) a lump sum amount equal to any annual bonus to which the executive would have been entitled for the year in which termination occurs, and (iv) if timely elected, in the case of Dr. Patel and Dr. Schwartz, 12 months and, in the case of Dr. Shah, 18 months, of Company-paid COBRA benefits.

In connection with a termination of the executive’s employment upon death or Disability (as defined in the Severance Agreements) of the executive, the executive (or the executive’s estate or beneficiaries) is entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts and a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus, if any, the executive would have earned for the year in which termination occurs.

The payments and benefits provided under the Severance Agreements in connection with a Change in Control may not be eligible for a federal income tax deduction by us pursuant to Section 280G of the Code. These

payments and benefits may also subject the executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. If the payments or benefits payable to an executive in connection with a Change in Control would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then those payments or benefits will be reduced if such reduction would result in a greater net after-tax benefit to the executive.

For purposes of the Severance Agreements, “Cause” means (as determined by the Board in their discretion exercised in good faith):

For purposes of the Severance Agreements, “Good Reason” means the occurrence of any of the following in each case during the term of employment without the executive’s written consent, which circumstances are not remedied by the Company within 30 days of its receipt of a written notice from the executive describing the applicable circumstances (which notice must be provided by the executive within 90 days of the executive’s knowledge of the applicable circumstances):

For purposes of the Severance Agreements, a “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred upon the occurrence of any one of the following events:

In addition, the stock option agreements with the named executive officers provide for accelerated vesting of 100% of the unvested portion of the shares underlying the stock option upon a termination of the executive’s employment with the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason (each as defined in the applicable stock option agreement) within 12 months following a Sale Event (as defined in the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan), as well as in the event of termination due to death or permanent and total Disability (as defined in the stock option agreements).

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits upon employment termination for Dr. Shah, as if his employment terminated as of December 31, 2021.

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits upon employment termination for Mr. Garcia-Parada, as if his employment terminated as of December 31, 2021.

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits upon employment termination for Dr. Patel, as if her employment terminated as of December 31, 2021.

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits upon employment termination for Dr. Schwartz, as if his employment terminated as of December 31, 2021.

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits upon employment termination for Mr. Wilson, as if his employment terminated as of December 31, 2021.

In November 2020, the Company entered into an offer letter with Carlos Garcia-Parada as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Garcia-Parada’s offer letter provided for “at will” employment. Mr. Garcia-Parada’s employment with the Company terminated effective March 16, 2022 and he continued to serve as an advisor to the Company until March 31, 2022. He did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with his termination of employment.

In September 2021, the Company entered into an offer letter with Martin Wilson as the Company’s General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, SVP. Mr. Garcia-Parada’s offer letter provides for “at will” employment. Pursuant to the offer letter, Mr. Wilson received a signing bonus of $100,000. If Mr. Wilson ceases to be employed by the Company for reasons other than his death or disability or a reduction in force by the Company prior to the first anniversary of his start date, Mr. Wilson must reimburse the Company for the entire signing bonus within 30 days of his termination of employment. If Mr. Wilson ceases to be employed by the Company for reasons other than his death or disability or a reduction in force by the Company after the first anniversary of his start date but prior to the second anniversary of his start date, Mr. Wilson must reimburse the Company for 50% of the signing bonus within 30 days of his termination of employment.

Our compensation and benefits philosophy and the overall structure of our compensation and benefit programs are broadly similar across the organization to encourage and reward all employees who contribute to our success. We strive to ensure the pay of each of our employees reflects the level of their job impact and responsibilities and is competitive within our peer group. Compensation rates are benchmarked and are generally set to be market-competitive. Our ongoing commitment to pay equity is critical to our success in supporting a diverse workforce with opportunities for all employees to grow, develop and contribute.

Under rules adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, we are required to calculate and disclose the total compensation paid to our median paid employee, as well as the ratio of the total compensation paid to the median employee as compared to the total compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). The paragraphs that follow describe our methodology and the resulting CEO Pay Ratio.

We identified the median employee using our employee population on December 31, 2021 (including all employees, whether employed on a full-time, part-time, seasonal or temporary basis).

We identified the median employee by looking at annual base pay and annual target cash incentive opportunity as of December 31, 2021 for all active employees as of that date. We did not perform adjustments to the compensation paid to part-time employees to calculate what they would have been paid on a full-time basis. In identifying the median employee, we did not exclude workers in non-U.S. countries and did not make any cost-of-living adjustments. Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the median employee’s annual total compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table.

Our median employee compensation as calculated using Summary Compensation Table requirements was $89,525. Our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table was $7,918,750. Therefore, our CEO Pay Ratio is approximately 88:1.

This information is being provided for compliance purposes and is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules, based on our internal records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. Accordingly, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Neither the Compensation Committee nor management of the Company used the CEO Pay Ratio measure in making compensation decisions.

The purpose of the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy is to provide a total compensation package that enables the Company to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high-caliber directors who are not employees or officers of the Company. The fees paid to non-employee directors, other than our Chairman, for service on the Board and for service on each committee of the Board on which the director is a member are as follows:

We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and out of pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending our Board and committee meetings. The Chairman of the Board does not receive any cash compensation and instead is compensated for service on the Board entirely in the form of equity.

In addition, each new non-employee director upon his/her election to the Board receives a one-time option grant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in such amount and on such terms as authorized by the Board, or by a committee appointed by the Board, subject to periodic review. Beginning in 2020, each non-employee director serving on the Board immediately following the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders receives an annual option grant on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders in such amount and on such terms as authorized by the Board, or by a committee appointed by the Board, subject to periodic review.

All of the foregoing option grants have or will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

The following table presents the total compensation for each person who served as a member of our Board during 2021. Other than as set forth in the table, we did not pay any compensation, make any equity awards or non-equity awards to, or pay any other compensation to any of the non-employee members of our Board in 2021. Gaurav D. Shah, M.D., our Chief Executive Officer, received no compensation for his service as a director during 2021, and, consequently, is not included in this table. The compensation received by Dr. Shah as an employee during 2021 is presented in the “2021 Summary Compensation Table” earlier in this proxy statement.

Other than compensation arrangements, we describe below the transactions, and series of similar transactions, since January 1, 2021, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

We have adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy, which requires that all related person transactions are reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee. This review covers any material transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which we were or are to be a participant, and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. A “related person” is any person who is or was one of our executive officers, directors or director nominees or is a holder of more than 5% of our common stock, or their immediate family members or any entity owned or controlled by any of the foregoing persons.

During April 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with a member of the Board of Directors for business development consulting services. Payments for the services under the agreement are $28 per quarter, and the Company may terminate the agreement with 14 days’ notice. The Company incurred expenses of $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, relating to services provided under this agreement.

In September 2021, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a member of the Board of Directors for pipeline development, new asset evaluation, and corporate strategy. In lieu of cash for services to be provided under the consulting agreement during its one-year term, the Company granted the board member options to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $0.4 million.

In October 2020, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the spouse of one of the Company’s executive officers for information technology advisory services. In exchange for the services provided under the agreement, the Company granted 10,000 restricted stock units which vest over a three-year period.

On August 27, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a fund affiliated with RTW Investments, LP, the Company’s largest shareholder (the “Purchaser”), pursuant to which it agreed to sell and issue to the Purchaser, in a private placement (the “Private Placement”), 812,516 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $32.48 per share for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $26.4 million to the Company before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The Private Placement closed on August 31, 2021. In addition, concurrently with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company agreed, following demand by the Purchaser, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the resale of shares of common stock held by the Purchaser as promptly as reasonably practicable following such demand, and in any event within 60 days of such demand.

On December 21, 2020, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a related party. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the related party provides certain business development and asset identification consulting services to the Company. The term of the consulting agreement is three years and may be terminated with 60 days’ notice by either party. In exchange for the business development services to be provided under the agreement, the Company issued a warrant exercisable for 603,386 shares of Common Stock. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the related party is entitled to receive additional warrants exercisable for common stock upon identification of new assets for the Company to in-license. The Company recorded a non-cash R&D expense of $26.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, related to the issuance of the Common Stock warrant.

On August 9, 2021, the Company issued a warrant exercisable for 301,291 shares of common stock to a related party for business development and asset identification consulting services (“August 2021 Warrant”). The Company recorded a non-cash R&D expense of $7.6 million during year ended December 31, 2021, related to the issuance of the August 2021 warrant. On December 17, 2021, the Company issued warrants exercisable for 153,155 and 153,155 shares of common stock, respectively to the same related party for business development and asset identification consulting services (“December 2021 Warrants”). The Company recorded a non-cash R&D expense of $5.2 million during year ended December 31, 2021, related to the issuance of the December 2021 warrant. Total non-cash R&D expense of $12.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2021, related to the issuance of the August 2021 and December 2021 warrants.

The following table sets forth certain information known to us regarding beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of April 18, 2022 for:

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. A person is deemed to be a beneficial holder of our common stock if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of our common stock, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such capital stock. Except as noted by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe based on the information provided to us that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

The table lists applicable percentage ownership based on 64,522,057 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 18, 2022. Shares of common stock that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days of April 18, 2022, pursuant to the exercise of options, warrants or other rights, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the persons holding these options for the purpose of computing percentage ownership of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing any other person’s ownership percentage.

Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, NJ 08512.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2021 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

Stockholder proposals and nominations should be addressed to our Secretary, c/o Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, NJ 08512.

The required notice must be in writing and received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90^th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120^th) day prior to the one-year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. However, in the event the annual meeting is first convened more than thirty (30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date, or if no annual meeting were held in the preceding year, a stockholder’s notice must be received by our corporate secretary not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90^th) day prior to the scheduled date of such annual meeting or the tenth (10^th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Accordingly, for stockholder proposals or nominations to be brought before the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, the required notice must be received by our corporate secretary at the address set forth above no earlier than February 13, 2023, and no later than March 15, 2023. Proposals and nominations not received within this time frame will be considered untimely.

Any stockholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act to be included in the proxy statement for the next annual meeting of our stockholders must satisfy the SEC’s regulations under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, and be received no later than December 31, 2022. Under Rule 14a-8, we are not required to include such stockholder proposals in our proxy materials unless this condition is satisfied. Accordingly, any notice of such stockholder proposals received after this date will be considered untimely. If the date of the annual meeting is moved by more than thirty (30) days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, then notice must be received within a reasonable time before we begin to print and send proxy materials. In the event of such a change to the annual meeting date, we will publicly announce the deadline for submitting a proposal in a press release or in a document filed with the SEC. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require us to include in our proxy statement and proxy card for such meeting any such stockholder proposal which does not meet the requirements of the SEC in effect at the time. Any such proposal will be subject to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

As of the time of preparation of this proxy statement, neither the Board nor management intends to bring before the Annual Meeting any business other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Annual Meeting and this proxy statement. If any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matters according to their best judgment.

Accompanying this proxy statement and posted on the investor relations portion of our website at www.rocketpharma.com with this proxy statement, is our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this proxy statement. We will also mail without charge, upon written request, a copy of that Annual Report excluding exhibits. Requests can be made by email by emailing info@rocketpharma.com, or by a written request addressed to our Secretary, c/o Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9 Cedarbrook Drive, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512.

Stockholders residing in the same household who hold their stock through a bank or broker may receive only one set of proxy materials in accordance with a notice sent earlier by their bank or broker unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. This practice will continue unless instructions to the contrary are received by your bank or broker from one or more of the stockholders within the household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy materials, as applicable, to such stockholders if you make a written or oral request to our corporate secretary at the address above, or by calling (646) 440-9100.

If you hold your shares in “street name” and reside in a household that received only one copy of the proxy materials, you can request to receive a separate copy in the future by following the instructions sent by your bank or broker. If your household is receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy materials, you may request that only a single set of materials be sent by following the instructions sent by your bank or broker.